Where Mitch Rapp Gets Some Teeth Knocked Out

Order to Kill by Kyle Mills
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I liked this quite a bit, and didn't think I would. This is my first book in this series (this particular title being written by Kyle Mills, not the original author Vince Flynn), and I hoped it would be pretty good, maybe sorta fun. It was better than that. I seldom read thriller/bestseller-type novels, and haven't usually enjoyed them much, but this one I did.

I was leaning toward 4.5 stars, but why be a jerk? I liked it, and it cost like a dollar at the library book store, so the least I can do is bump it up to a full 5.

This is an action novel, and it starts right in from the beginning. There is a tiny lull a fraction of the way in, IMO, but after that the story just ramps up pretty much continuously until the conclusion. By the end, I was won over, unironically enjoying it, and I think I might like to go back to the beginning of this series and see if I like all of them. (I started with #15 just because that's the one I picked up when I was in a buying mood.) One of my preferences is having a character with intelligence or superior skills who uses those skills. If you're awesome, be awesome. That's what's fun to read. Sherlock has to be smarter than everyone else. John Wick doesn't miss. An Oscar Wilde character has to be witty. And Mitch Rapp has to be the most badass guy around.

(I hate the books where the character is supposed to be an amazing investigator but he or she dithers and screws up and makes no progress for 90% of the book before pulling it out at the end. That's a drag and a missed opportunity. I want to see them be awesome. I want to see Reacher beat up an obnoxious bully, and I want to watch Patrick Jane trick a suspect into revealing what they're trying their best to hide, and I want to watch President Jed Bartlet school someone who was trying to make him look bad, and I want to hear Mona Lisa Vito tell the prosecutor the exact ignition timing for a 1964 Bel Air with a 327. I love that. Be awesome.)

It definitely costs Mitch something, though. He's not superman. Mitch has to suffer a lot of pain and misery to do what needs to be done, which feels fair in a novel. His goals are something easy to root for, which is stopping some pretty bad terrorism, and his bad guys are generally pretty hateful, so it's easy to side with him. But suprisingly (for me, for this type of book) even the really bad guys can also have a bit of heart, and I think that works. It's largely black-and-white, but the bits of gray help, so that it feels like real life, just with very skilled people.

So--good character, exciting story, lots of action, and clear, sharp writing. It works.

I've usually overlooked this author (well, the original author) and series, because this isn't my usual fare, but I'm adding it to the list. I'll probably find lots more at the thrift shops....

Recommended. Good summer reading, anyway.

View all my reviews

Where Jonny Finds a Cave Deep in the Sea

The Demon of the Deep by Brad Quentin
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Overall, this MG novel does a pretty good job of updating the great 60s cartoon of Jonny Quest. Four stars seems about right. That's how much I approved of it; I think a young reader could be from 3 to 5 with it, but I dunno.

This doesn't have quite as much zing as the old cartoons, which were strangely compelling and exciting in an era when cartoons were usually pretty tame, but it does a good job of giving us a very similar story and feel. Like the cartoon, there is genuine danger, even if it's treated a little like everything will work out. (Nobody is freaking out the way they would in real life.) The characters interact with one another in the same way. They've added a female character, Race Bannon's daughter, and that's a nice update. Makes the story slightly different, more modern, and that's great. She integrates with the team very well. They also sprinkle in concerns for the environment and wildlife in a way I liked. Not heavy-handed, but very direct anyway.

Like the cartoons, we have an exotic setting, off in the south Pacific, including underwater, with some cool science and a dangerous creature. (Not a giant metal spider or Komodo dragon; here we have a giant squid.) From about 25 pages in, this felt a lot like it could have been a Jonny Quest episode on TV. (No, not exactly. But close.)

Compared to an Indiana Jones book I just finished, which for most of the novel didn't seem like the same character or franchise as the movies, this felt quite a bit like the original, especially the dialogue. Dr. Quest gives little speeches, Race is professional and worries about keeping everyone safe, Jonny and Hadji (and Jessie, the new character) joke around like kids, and Bandit the dog--well, he barks. I could picture the characters in my head saying and doing the things they do in this book.

I wouldn't say it will please every reader, but I think it comes close to the target for this franchise. It's a MG book, pretty standard at a bit over 100 pages, with good pacing, so I think a lot of readers would like this, even though they only made a few titles in the series. (Eleven. I checked. That's actually pretty good.) Too bad it didn't catch on--maybe they'll try again.

Some of us old people haven't forgotten Saturday mornings, and we have grandkids who might like the same stuff. :) Recommended.

View all my reviews

Where Indy Meets Zombies

Indiana Jones and the Army of the Dead by Steve Perry
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

I enjoyed maybe the last 100 pages or so--maybe less--but it's not a great book. Average? Okay. I gave it 3 stars--good enough to finish, maybe read another.

My biggest complaint as I read this was that it was very hard to imagine Indiana Jones as the person in the story. A few times in the last couple scenes, a recognizable Indy seemed to emerge, but for most of the book it felt like just some random character with his name. He was just a guy walking in the jungle without much to do. He should have been much more enterprising, more impressive, doing cooler stuff.

IMO.

Some of this works as an Indiana Jones adventure. Nicely exotic setting? Check. Some Nazis (and some Japanese soldiers, too)? Check. Some supernatural stuff going on? Check. Even a love interest. But it's thin. The whole story takes place in Haiti and a smaller island off Haiti, unlike the variety of settings you get in an Indiana Jones adventure. And the first half at least is very slow, with a long walk across an island that seems kinda pointless. You want a fast pace with lots of action, but we don't get that until the very end.

And in fact, to be fair, the very end is pretty good. There just wasn't enough story leading up to that to make this a full adventure novel. Should have been a novella. Or maybe a tight short story.

I liked bits of this, and I'm curious about all the other tie-in novels that I've never read. So I may look at some more of these. But I hope they feel more like the movies...

View all my reviews

Where Grandma and Grandpa Crack Me Up

Remember Me by Mary Balogh
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This is a very good book. IMO. All five stars.

As a reader, coming from the Jane Austen universe, I've always liked a Regency setting, which makes this author and series a draw for me. I didn't understand any of it when I read Pride and Prejudice in college--but that was a while ago, and now it makes a lot more sense to me. I also like how these novels are clustered in "series," though they're more related than consecutive. (Which is fine, either way.) That means the reader already has an idea of characters and backgrounds going into the novel, making the early parts smoother and more entertaining. I feel the same way about big series, like Star Trek books, or Doc Savage, or popular characters like Sherlock Holmes, where you're familiar with the people and background so you can pick up the book and be into the story very quickly. It lowers barriers to enjoying the novel. And the way Mary Balogh writes several books about a single family, you have the same advantage here--many of the same characters show up in multiple books.

I especially find that a help when I'm trying to remember the names of the characters, who is related to whom, and where we know "Aunt Kitty" from. I have often made charts for myself (and taught students to do the same) because I am crap at names in books and real life. And TBH, the author OFTEN throws a whole paragraph of names at the reader in a way I can't absorb all at once--but spread across several books, I work it out. It's a brain saver.

Speaking of the book on its own--it's really good. This is a satisfying story with a lot of sympathetic characters and human moments. The FMC and MMC are likable from the start, but so are most of their relatives and extended families. The main characters are flawed, sure; they're damaged, for certain. But they're good people, and it's easy to root for them. What I found very curious is how the two had a genuine issue separating them, a moment in their past when Lucas accidentally insulted Philippa in her hearing. What he said was horrible, particularly for that era, but it was out of character for him, being spoken in anger, and we learn [spoiler of a general nature]....................... that he had good reason to be angry--just not at her. Anyway, it's a wall between them, when they should have been perfect for each other. The curious part is how his grandfather, acting like a matchmaker or fairy godfather, pushes at them to break down that wall. He's relentless, and kinda selfish because he wants his heir to marry and make another generation of heirs, but he's also sympathetic and pretty funny. His wife is cool, too. But the point is--still spoiling a bit--his meddling is an actual help.

(He's like the anti-Lady Catherine de Bourgh, whose opposition and meddling did more to drive Elizabeth and Darcy together than almost anything else. He meddles on the side of the angels.)

And the final ending (you see, there is a sort of ending, then a bigger ending, then a final ending...) is touching and sweet, and though the novel has its obligatory HEA, a very satisfying one, there is also a sad, sweet, lovely ending after that.

I found this both fun to read and emotionally satisfying--a love story as well as a family story. Recommended for just about any reader.

View all my reviews

Two Curses and a Lie

Euripides: Hippolytus by Sophie Mills
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

If you maybe want to read this, don't be discouraged from that. It's a pretty fast, fairly entertaining read. But it's not super fun is all.

The gods are such jerks. Hippolytus loves hunting, so he loves Artemis way more than Aphrodite. He's a bit negative towards women, so that's on him, but his attitude annoys Aphrodite, making her ruin his life. She makes his stepmother, Phaedra, fall in love with him. She lets a servant in on her shameful secret, and the servant tries to get Hippolytus to oblige her. He says no way. Phaedra is so ashamed she hangs herself, but writes a note blaming her stepson, alleging an assault that never happened.

His dad, Theseus, believes her lie and banishes his son, cursing him at the same time. (He had a curse ready because his dad was Poseidon, who granted him three such curses.) Theseus crashes his chariot, is brought home dying, and now, finally, Artemis comes to tell Theseus that he shouldn't have believed his wife's note. He apologizes to his son before he dies, and vows to get revenge on anyone Aphrodite loves.

A cheery crowd-pleaser. :)

So the gods stir up trouble and the people suffer. I don't enjoy that kind of story a bunch, tbh. But I still kind of liked it, because it's at least interesting in a "Wow! This is what they believed" kinda way.

3 stars.

View all my reviews

Where Bolan Hunts for Treasure

Ambush on Blood River by Don Pendleton
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

(4 stars ranked on the pulp fiction scale, that is.)

This is a pretty good Mack Bolan novel. I liked his fights against the mafia more than his later books, fighting against terrorists and assorted bad guys, for reasons I'm still musing on. But this is pretty good, too. I was leaning toward a lower score, but the last two chapters jumped up, with a final act that wouldn't be out of place in a decent action movie.

A man convinces Bolan that sensitive papers, originally stored in a safe deposit box, were accidentally stolen along with a lot of treasure, then hidden and abandoned for years somewhere in the Congo. They needed to be located and removed, with the stolen gold and silver as well, before a local warlord found it. The papers contained some US secrets that could be damaging if exposed, making the matter significant enough that Bolan would take it on.

Though it's quickly-written pulp fiction, the kind that demands lots of action and not a ton of research, the author (journalist Alan Bomack, writing under the collective pseudonym of Don Pendleton) demonstrates a decent command of the facts regarding the history and status of countries in that part of Africa in the 1980s, especially the intervention of the US and other countries in government and business, as well as providing a convincing description of settings and local conditions. This type of novel doesn't usually demand much verisimilitude beyond the proper description of guns and explosives; it seems like his pride demanded a little more.

It's still an action novel, meant just to entertain with a fast-paced plot, and though it lags a bit in the middle I think it works well overall. And at about 60K words, it doesn't overstay its welcome. I feel like the modern publishing universe could use a lot more books in the 160-200 page range, which seemed much more common in the 70s and 80s. It takes a lot of energy to commit to 800-page books. :)

This is a somewhat better than average example of the genre. Recommended for readers who are looking for that.

View all my reviews

Where Machiavelli Freaks You Out

The Prince by Niccolò Machiavelli
My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Like most people, probably, I read parts of this in school at different times. I decided I should look at the whole thing instead of just bits, and I would say there are small rewards for taking the time to do it. Not enough for most readers, but you might want to.

It's not all that long, anyway.

Obviously, this whole essay-style writing is very Machiavellian, making it generally good advice only for people without scruples. It's not about being a moral person. It's entirely advice on how to keep yourself in power once you arrive there, and it is so practical that is also often deeply unethical and unprincipled, even straight up evil. The good of the people is not considered, because the people are not his audience, and a prince would only care about the people to the extent that it mattered to his continued success in controlling his princedom.

To understand how the author thought, the reader should conceive of the people in Machiavelli's writings the same way we would normally consider animals on a farm. They are possessions or tools, a means to an end, a way to be wealthy and powerful. Their good only enters into the equation when or if it supports the prince and helps him maintain control over his lands.

"A prince wishing to keep his state," he writes, "is very often forced to do evil." (Isn't that the kind of thing sociopaths say? You forced me--I didn't want to do that.) Sure, make them love you if you can so that they cooperate with you, so they don't rise up, but don't hesitate to destroy enemies and malcontents in a way that terrifies others. He also says that the prince "cannot observe all those things for which men are esteemed, being often forced, in order to maintain the state, to act contrary to fidelity, friendship, humanity, and religion." That's pretty bad, doncha think? He has practical advice on how to do this, and in the abstract it sounds like advice on weeding your garden, but when you think about it any deeper it is beyond disturbing.

He didn't care. He wasn't writing for you or me.

What I was most surprised to realize was that he was very well informed and educated, more than I thought. He uses examples from the history of Rome, ancient Greece and Persia, and all of Europe at different stages of history. He knows historical details about campaigns and leadership styles and a lot more, giving his arguments a pretty good basis in fact. The style, though, is kinda goofy. It's all written like a flowchart: "you could take power this way or that way; if the first, you might do a or b; if the second, c or d; if you want to achieve X, you can do Y or Z; if Y, this or that might happen..." It feels like a simplistic view of personality and causality and possibility, as if everything breaks into two or three simple categories, each with its corresponding series of action that will lead to success. However, I like this for one reason: he is pushing back against the medieval/Renaissance belief in fate, the wheel of fate, the way people are brought up and then cast down and there's nothing you can do to alter that. He thinks you can act to decide your fate, and I prefer that as a philosophy.

Near the end, he addresses the practicality of that belief in the face of reality, where unforeseen events can change history. He admits that there are forces beyond our control, but fate or fortune isn't wholly in charge. He says, "I hold it to be true that Fortune is the arbiter of one-half of our actions, but that she still leaves us to direct the other half, or perhaps a little less." He talks about a flooding river that can carry everything away despite anything we do, but argues that we can prepare for floods and mitigate their harm the next time. Not bad advice.

As much as anything, I found it interesting to see how people thought 500 years ago. The Prince isn't terribly amusing on its own, just for pleasure reading, but his first-person essay and advice does answer some questions about our ancestors and the way they saw the world. And it reminds a modern person why we want to limit the power of elected officials and others. Don't give them the chance to put Machiavelli into practice.

View all my reviews